Chemical Structure

Metabolite Name

Introduction & Chemical Diversity

Floral volatile organic compounds (VOCs) represent a vast and diverse chemical landscape, crucial for plant ecology. Over 1700 compounds have been identified (Ref: Knudsen et al., 2006). Systematic reviews highlight recurring patterns:

Most Frequently Detected Individual Floral VOCs

Percentage of surveyed plant species (N=305) in which each specific VOC was detected. Data from Farré-Armengol et al. (2020), Fig 1A[2].

Most Common Dominant (>25%) Individual Floral VOCs

Percentage of surveyed plant species (N=305) where the specified VOC constituted >25% of the total floral scent blend. Data from Farré-Armengol et al. (2020), Fig 1B[2].

Biosynthesis Pathways

Most floral VOCs originate from these core pathways:

  • Terpenoids: Via MEP (plastid; monoterpenes, C10) and MVA (cytosol; sesquiterpenes, C15) pathways.[3]
  • Benzenoids/Phenylpropanoids: From L-Phenylalanine (Shikimate pathway), yielding C6C1, C6C2, and C6C3 structures.[3]
  • Fatty Acid Derivatives: Primarily C6 "Green Leaf Volatiles" from C18 fatty acids via the LOX pathway.[3]
  • Others: Including Nitrogen- and Sulphur-containing compounds.[2][3]

Pathway Overview Diagram

Simplified schematic of major floral volatile biosynthesis routes. Hover over nodes for structures.

Terpenoid Biosynthesis Phenylpropanoid/Benzenoid Biosynthesis Fatty Acid Derivatives Plastid (MEP Pathway) Cytosol (MVA Pathway) Cytosol / Peroxisome Pyruvate + G3P DMAPP / IPP GPP (C10) Monoterpenes Acetyl-CoA DMAPP / IPP FPP (C15) Sesquiterpenes L-Phenylalanine Phenylacetaldehyde Phenylethyl Alcohol (C6C2) trans-Cinnamic acid p-Coumaric acid Phenylpropanoids (C6C3) Benzoic Acid Pathway Benzenoids (C6C1) Fatty Acids (C18) Hydroperoxides Fatty Acid Derivatives (C6 etc) MEP GPPS TPS MVA FPPS TPS PAL C4H EGS/IGS etc. PAAS/AAAT PAR β-Ox / Non-β-Ox BSMT/BPBT etc. LOX HPL/ADH/AAT

Regulation of Floral Scent Emission

Scent production and emission are tightly controlled processes:

  • Temporal Regulation: Emission often follows circadian rhythms synchronized with pollinator activity (e.g., LHY controls timing)[1], and changes across developmental stages.[3]
  • Spatial Regulation: Specific organs often produce distinct VOCs.[3]
  • Transcriptional Control: Key transcription factors (e.g., ODO1, EOBII in Petunia) orchestrate pathway gene expression.[1][3]

Examples of Regulatory Mechanisms

Specific examples illustrating the regulation of floral scent emission.

Regulatory Aspect Specific Example Organism / Context Function / Timing Reference
Circadian Clock Gene LHY (homologs) Petunia hybrida, Nicotiana attenuata Represses scent pathway genes (e.g., ODO1) in the morning, determines timing of nocturnal emission. [1]
Rhythmic Gene Expression PAL, BSMT1/2, EGS, IGS, ADT, CM1 etc. Petunia hybrida mRNA levels oscillate diurnally, contributing to rhythmic emission. [1]
Transcription Factor (Activator) ODO1 (R2R3-MYB) Petunia hybrida Master positive regulator of multiple benzenoid pathway genes. [1]
Transcription Factor (Activator Cascade) EOBII -> EOBI (R2R3-MYBs) Petunia hybrida Sequential activation leading to scent production. [1]
Transcription Factor (Repressor) PhMYB4 (R2R3-MYB) Petunia hybrida Specifically represses C4H (eugenol/isoeugenol path). [3]
Developmental Regulation Methyl Benzoate Emission Antirrhinum majus Peaks at anthesis; involves enzyme activity & substrate availability. [3]

Ecological Functions & Environmental Factors

Floral scent plays vital roles in mediating interactions and responding to the environment:

  • Ecological Functions: Primarily attracting pollinators, but also defending against antagonists and contributing to reproductive isolation.[2][3]
  • Biotic Factors: Pollinator type is a major selective pressure, leading to correlations summarized below (Pollination Syndromes Table).[2]
  • Abiotic Factors: Climate significantly influences scent profiles (Climate Correlations Table). Pollutants like ozone can degrade scent signals.[2]
  • Phylogeny: Scent traits show moderate phylogenetic conservation but also frequent convergent evolution.[2]

Floral Scent Characteristics & Pollination Syndromes

Summary of significant correlations from Farré-Armengol et al. (2020)[2].

Pollinator Group Key Scent Trait Correlations Common Associated VOCs/Notes
Wind Lower richness, Higher FAD % GLVs (defense).
Birds Lower total VOC richness Often scentless.
Bats Higher S-compound richness/ % Dimethyl Disulfide/Trisulfide.
Lepidoptera Higher total/Benzenoid/N-compound richness Linalool, Benzyl Acetate, Indole.
Beetles Higher N-compound richness Variable (fruity, spicy, aminoid).
Flies Higher N-compound richness Amines, S-compounds (mimics), Benzaldehyde.
Bees Generalists Linalool, β-Ocimene, etc. common.

Climate Correlations with Floral Scent Composition

Summary of significant phylogenetic correlations from Farré-Armengol et al. (2020)[2].

Scent Trait Climatic Variable Correlation Interpretation
Sesquiterpene Richness/Emission Mean Annual Temp Positive (+) High temp favors less volatile VOCs.
Monoterpene Relative % Precipitation / Temp Negative (-) More prevalent in drier/warmer conditions.
FAD Richness/Relative % Precipitation Positive (+) More common in wetter areas.
FAD Richness/Relative % Aridity Index Negative (-) Less common in arid areas.
N-Compound Emission Precipitation Negative (-) Reduced emission in wetter climates.
S-Compound Richness/Relative % Precipitation Negative (-) Less prevalent in very wet regions.
Gaussen Aridity Index: Lower values indicate higher aridity.

Key References

[1] Fenske, M. P., & Imaizumi, T. (2016). Circadian Rhythms in Floral Scent Emission. Frontiers in Plant Science, 7, 462. [DOI]
[2] Farré-Armengol, G., Fernández-Martínez, M., Filella, I., Junker, R. R., & Peñuelas, J. (2020). Deciphering the Biotic and Climatic Factors That Influence Floral Scents: A Systematic Review of Floral Volatile Emissions. Frontiers in Plant Science, 11, 1154. [DOI]
[3] Muhlemann, J. K., Klempien, A., & Dudareva, N. (2014). Floral volatiles: from biosynthesis to function. Plant, Cell & Environment, 37(8), 1936-1949. [DOI]